
Every artifact requested, what it proves, and the ceiling each gap is holding the score at.
Evidence-fed assessments that read your client's real policies, pre-fill the questionnaire with cited answers, and score what actually runs — not what someone typed into a box.
How the reveal works
Di Svella ingests your client's real policies and evidence, pre-fills the assessment with cited, confidence-rated answers, and verifies the high-risk claims against what's actually in place.
What's broken, who wins with the fix, how it works, and why Di Svella is different.
Every assessment tool hands you a blank questionnaire and trusts whatever gets typed into it. You end up with a tidy compliance percentage that says nothing about whether the controls actually work.
The real storyThe real story — the vague answers, the numbers that change between interviews, the policy nobody follows — surfaces months later, in an audit or a breach.Di Svella was built to surface it now.
Win more deals. Out-deliver the six-figure firms. Keep the margin.
Run more assessments per quarter without adding senior headcount.
Turn a fixed-scope assessment into a defensible narrative — with evidence.
See where your controls actually stand between audits.
Their evidence, in
Di Svella's hands.
Every control, already drafted.
Talk only about what evidence can't answer.
Two scores. Never a flat percentage.
Assessment and audit aren't separate products — they're a depth dial you set per control.
Implementation and Operational Maturity, side by side, each 0–100.
Every answer carries a visible trail back to its source. When evidence contradicts attestation, evidence wins.
When a key number changes three times across interviews, Di Svella flags the instability itself.
Every finding is weighted by who said it — your report survives the, "Well, that's just our PM" objection.
Evidence-fed assessments with dual scoring.
Reconcile attestations against real evidence.
Close gaps, track remediation, and re-score to prove operational maturity is rising.
Every assessment ends in a document someone has to defend. Di Svella produces three, all built from the evidence — not a flat percentage and a PDF export of a questionnaire.

Every artifact requested, what it proves, and the ceiling each gap is holding the score at.

Two honest scores, the top findings ranked, and the exact climb to raise them — for the board and the client's sponsor.

Per-control: the assessed answer, a citation to its source, confidence and sufficiency shown as separate things, and a recommendation with the tier it unlocks — for the CISO and the engineers.
Hand your client a report they can take to their board — and defend in an audit.
See a sample reportJoin the early-access group and run your next assessment on evidence, not answers.